<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>Green Building Forum - Energy Assessment</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 04:10:05 +0100</lastBuildDate>
			<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.0.3</generator>
			<item>
		<title>Heat flux measurements</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18380</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18380</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 17:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have been dreaming about a project that measures heat flux through walls <br /><br />The big news is that my dream is about to come true <br /><br />I would be keen to from any others who have heat flux data for walls of any type please]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Assessment of EWI effectiveness in an 1890 house</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18350</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18350</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 15:34:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jam295</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi all,<br /><br />A couple of years ago, we bought a two-storey 4-bedroom 1890 detached Victorian house in north-west England (108 sqm footprint, 350 sqm wall area) in need of substantial rennovation. We have replastered, replumbed and rewired the interior and it is now heated by a modern gas boiler and radiators, with wet underfloor heating for the kitchen-diner area. The exterior was rendered long ago, and the rendering is in extremely poor condition and needs to be replaced. At the same time as replacing the rendering, we are trying to decide whether to also add external wall insulation (EWI), as the walls are currently uninsulated. We would use breathable external wall insulation, and prefer a natural product such as wood fibre. We have quotes for (uninsulated) Ksystem TC15 Silicone Solo for the render (base, mesh, primer, silicone), which is marketed as &quot;breathable&quot;.<br /><br />The house has &quot;early cavity walls&quot;, so the cavity is only a few cm, and not wide enough for cavity wall insulation. We decided not to insulate internally due to worries about condensation forming in the walls. There is a loft, and a cellar under the front of the house.<br /><br />I have used the SapJS calculator at https://openenergymonitor.org/sapjs/ and entered our building's properties, as best as I can estimate them. The modelled annual heating energy usage is about 48,000 kWh, which matches our actual annual usage (measured from gas bills) to within about 8%. I am somewhat skeptical that this is not a fluke, due to all the uncertainties involved, but for the moment let's assume it is roughly right. The model predicts 42% of total heat loss going through the walls.<br /><br />I used a current U-value for the walls of 1 W/m2K, based on the different layers (inner surface, plasterboard, timber battens/gap, inner leaf, air gap, outer leaf, render, outer surface). Bringing this down to 0.3 W/m2K with EWI to meet building regulations would reduce total heating energy usage to 33,000 kWh, and save about £1000 per year.<br /><br />Our motivations are not purely financial; we would also like to reduce our energy expenditure for environmental reasons, so even if it took a while to pay back, we would probably still do it, so long as the upfront cost (over and above the existing project cost of rerendering) was not prohibitive. <br /><br />Ideally, we would eventually like to install a heat pump and solar panels, but our understanding is that the heat pump would only be powerful enough if the house is well-insulated.<br /><br />My concerns are:<br />- My modelling with SapJS is a lay-person's calculation, and I would like to get this professionally assessed. The important question is &quot;How effective will the EWI be?&quot;, because if it does not save significant energy, it is not worth doing.<br />- The house has many other heat losses, e.g. from draughts and uninsulated suspended floors in the front of the house. Does this reduce the effectiveness of the EWI, or is this an entirely decoupled problem?<br />- The wall cavities open at the top into the (cold) loft, and there are air bricks in the outer skin for ventilation to reduce moisture in the cavity. If the walls are left like this, then hot air will easily convect out of the top, presumably causing massive heat loss. We could seal the cavities at the top and block the air bricks, but will this cause problems with moisture/condensation? Could the cavity instead be vented internally? Since the cavity will now be warm, as it will be inside the insulation, maybe this is not a problem? Alternatively, could we fill the cavities, since now that they will be warm, interstitial condensation shouldn't be a problem?<br /><br />What sort of professional could I hire to give me the best advice, taking into account the particular nature of this old building, and all the &quot;edge cases&quot; that might be relevant to the decision? I have found companies who will do an energy assessment, but will this be careful and customised enough? I've heard that EPC assessments are often very rudimentary, and I need more than a basic tick-box exercise. Do I need an architect? Some sort of building engineer?<br /><br />How can I know whether the EWI installer will take proper care of all the junctions and edges, which I understand are vital for avoiding cold bridges? Do they need to worry about interstitial condensation?<br /><br />I would appreciate any advice that people here might have.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Energy consumption meter</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18016</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18016</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 11:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>revor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Anyone used a plugin meter that I can check out some of my appliances that they can recommend. A number of outlets sell the same brand but have in the main poor reviews. I have got a fair idea from my smart meter by switching on when consumption elsewhere is small. Not convenient to switch everything else off. That is telling me my TV is consuming 140/150 W <br />whereas the energy "certificate" says it is 111 w. The label on the back of the TV says 347W bit puzzling but maybe that may be to cover other stuff one may plug in and take power off the TV.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to carry out on site assessments for energy audits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=18005</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:48:28 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Beau</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi  all<br /><br />I have been roped in to help a friend with a few energy audits. We are just collecting information from the sites and passing the info on to a contractor. I went for the first one last week with no training and don't think my friend has done much. Loads of info to collect some of which is not a simple matter like what insulation type/thickness is in walls and roofs (no access to either). I was a bit taken aback by the amount of guesswork involved and recorded to be taken as gospel!<br /><br />If I am going to help again I want to do as good a job as possible as I see duff data as worse than useless.<br /><br />I suspect some of you good folk know what's involved in doing a proper job and would very much like to hear what you think I should know. <br /><br />In all honesty, I do not think it right how we did the job last week but if I don't I suspect someone else who doesn't give two hoots would replace me.<br /><br />Thanks<br />Beau]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal Bridge Modelling - which software would you recommend?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11107</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=11107</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>harper16</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The company I work for are looking to buy some thermal bridge modelling software to more accurately model building fabric (improve SAP modelling accuracy).<br />Does any one use thermal bridging modelling and if so, what can you recommend?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Another U-value calculator</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16112</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16112</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2019 12:58:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've just come across another U-value calculator - https://www.ubakus.de/u-wert-rechner/?<br /><br />It looks professional and works out condensation and decrement delay and suchlike to EU standards.<br /><br />It has an English language option, but only some of the content is in English. The rest remains in German. So if anybody with better German with me wants to have a go and see how useful it is, that would be helpful.<br /><br />PS It might be better to use it before brexit, from some of the statements on the site about access within the EU.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Energy Calculation Spreadsheet</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17379</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17379</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>vord</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I made my own energy calculation spreadsheet to help me through a SAP calculation.   There was nothing out there but the maths are really simple.   <br /><br />I made a spreadsheet that takes the calculation steps from U value calculations through degree days through to energy use calculations.  <br /><br />https://www.the-salutation.co.uk/photos/u-value-calcs2.xlsx<br /><br />It's not perfect.   But I'm never going do anything more with it.  Better to open source it to you lot to take it forwards.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Delighted with draft SAP EPC of &quot;B&quot; (82)</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17296</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17296</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Dominic Cooney</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Made a start on getting a SAP EPC done for the barn conversion, as we need one for Building Regs and also to claim the RHi for the Ground Source Heat Pump system.<br />It's only a draft at the moment because it isn't quite finished yet, but I was delighted that it came out at a "B"<br /><br />Better than the "C" that we got for the last place we did (of similar solid stone wall construction) <br /><br />The only thing we could have done better on would be PV but the roof is East/West and I don't think we have any room inside for invertor(s) but I would not rule it out in the future.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Simple Energy Advice?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17227</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17227</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 16:53:26 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Has anybody looked at the government's Simple Energy Advice website:<br /><br />https://www.simpleenergyadvice.org.uk/energy-efficiency/reduce-bills<br /><br />I just filled in their assessment and it came up with complete rubbish suggestions! Fit a new gas main (that won't cost anything!). Replace my doors (200 year payback according to them). Fit solar thermal and solar PV. etc etc.<br /><br />I'd be interested to know if it comes up with equally silly suggestions for other people or if it's just because I live in an unusual house.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Energy Performance Certificates</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16953</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16953</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>lloydroutley</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi everyone,<br /><br />i am a final year Building Surveying student at UWE and am currently carrying out some research regarding Energy Performance Certificates for my dissertation. I'm looking for home owners who are interested in energy efficiency within their homes to take part in a quick survey. I would greatly appreciate anyone who can spare a few minutes to take part!<br /><br />You can find the link for the survey on the consent form here:<br /><br />https://www.dropbox.com/s/ogiiny8pymsgqkr/Dissertation%20Consent%20Form%20-%20LR.pdf?dl=0<br /><br />The following links are a privacy notice for anyone concerned about the safety of their data, as well as a participation information sheet providing more information about the research.<br /><br />Privacy notice - https://www.dropbox.com/s/7pg7ok26f7896gn/Dissertation%20Privacy%20notice%20for%20research%20participants%20-%20LR.pdf?dl=0<br /><br />Participant info sheet - https://www.dropbox.com/s/xcp6hm442cl2iz2/Dissertation%20participant%20information%20sheet%20-%20LR.pdf?dl=0<br /><br />Thank you!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>LED savings</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16783</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16783</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have just done a consultancy on LED lighting and commensurate savings <br /><br />Unusually two regularly use spaces one a gym and the other a art area both remote from the other buildings and both with radiant electric heating.<br /><br />In both cases I rejected the winter savings on heating, can you see why? <br /><br />I have a very interesting semantic point on LED and it is true too --Â  when the energyÂ rating of lighting is reduced less heat goes into the building as lost heat from lighting (saved on electricity bill) BUT in the heating season this heat was reducing the demand from the heating systemÂ and so not all of the savings attributed to LED are genuinely available, there is often a cost saving but it will be the difference in cost between electrically produced heat and oil or lpg heat which is delivered cheaper per kWh output.<br />In the space with electric radiant heating there is no saving for changing to LED !!!!!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Getting SAP figure down</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16743</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16743</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 20:51:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi <br /><br />A friends built a SIP house , 3G glazing , dont know exact wall, fabric thickness but I think its pretty low close to U=0.1 , individual MHRV in kitchen bathroom, PV on roof <br />Trouble is he's fittted a peat stove and it seems more problematically electric resistance heating rads. as a back up <br />though he wasnt expecting to use them much.<br />this has brought his SAP figure up too high for building regs sign off.<br />originally it was speced ASHP with UFH. <br />Anyone know the best bang for bucks to get it down.<br />Assessor told him he'd be better of with an oil boiler and rad with regards to SAP which seems odd given the carbon intensity of grid electric is falling to make it almost close the natural gas. <br />He's looking for a quick solution to resolve the issue.<br />I suggested just taking the electric rads out or switching to a couple of air/air heat pump units<br />thanks for any advice]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RHI metering and monitoring package</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15688</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:36:05 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>RobinB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I just came across this, has anyone done it? I wonder if still going? We have ASHP and it sounds interesting. I'd like to know what use is being made of the data too. <br /><br />https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/sites/default/files/docs/drhi_essentialguidetooptionalmonitoring_v2_0_mar_2016.pdf]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Measuring the temperature under my solid floor</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2926</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2926</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I decided to measure the temperature under my solid uninsulated floor<br /><br />So far at 250mm down it is 18.75 C and at 450 it is constant 18.5 <br /><br />I am doing a run at 750mm deep over the next 48 hours <br /><br />With this very slow temperature gradient the rate of heat flow must be low I think and therefore the heat loss much smaller than generally  accepted.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Realistic SAP Calculation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16276</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16276</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:19:02 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>vord</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I want to have a realistic SAP calculation done for building regs relating to work on an old building (it's unusual - mostly Victorian ish built around a Tudor structure).<br /><br />The previous SAP calculation used Build Desk and over-estimated energy usage by about 6 times (even after correcting to my degree days).  That makes it not at all useful to me for prioritising improvements that might result in a real reduction in energy use. Instead it forces me to spend my budget insulating the mistakes in the calculation rather than work on the important stuff.<br /><br />Is it normal for officially recognised SAP calculations to be so far off the mark?   <br /><br />Can anyone recommend a way to have a SAP calculation done that accurately represents the build level of the house at the moment.  Some it insulated to passiv haus standards and some is still single glazed.  It needs to be accepted by building regs but otherwise I would like it to be as accurate as possible.   I'll provide a spreadsheet with dimensions, wall constructions, and the Lambda values for materials I have used.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Cost benefit analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16277</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16277</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:32:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[An organisation I am helping has anoften used area with 13kW of aged lighting, they have been offered free replacement luminaries on the basis of them signing over the savings to the installers.<br /><br />I said steer well clear, replace the lights at your expense and you fully benefit from the savings.<br /><br />Replacement scheme is priced at 45k<br /><br />Lights on average 5 hours a day six days a week <br /><br />Cost benefit analysis is my job and I want to include additional cost for replacing the â€œsaved energyâ€ with an allowance to generate the saved electricity with gas heating during the heating season.<br /><br /><br />They pay 10.5 p per kWh for electric and 6.2 for gas <br /><br />Saved electricity Â£15k   Gas heat in winter = Â£3.5k  &gt;&gt; savings = 11.5k   <br /><br />Four year payback, why hasnâ€™t it been done already? <br /><br /><br />Please pick holes]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Degree days - base temperature</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15604</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15604</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>djh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I know some on here are interested in degree days and there has been some discussion of base temperatures. I haven't been especially interested and I don't remember exactly what was discussed. But I subscribe to the Vilnis Vesma Energy update newsletter and today it was all about degree-day base temperatures. It refers back to the website which includes details of what base temperature to use and how to calculate them.<br /><br />http://www.enmanreg.org/degree-day-base-temperature/<br /><br />There's also a bunch of other information about degree days and other topics on the site.<br /><br />In the newsletter, it mentions a spreadsheet: &quot;I'd like to thank regular reader David Bridger who sent me an Excel spreadsheet which, when given monthly consumption and degree-day figures to base 15.5C, will estimate the correct base temperature to use. I have his permission to distribute this with my training courses&quot;]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Online certified CPD</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16072</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=16072</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>rytech</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi There,<br />Any On Construction Domestic Energy Assessors on here that could advise on any good sites for completing online CPD in relation to energy assessment? Thanks in advance for any advice.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>PHPP question - easy to change building orientation?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15563</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15563</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 21:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>RobinB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So itâ€™s been a long time since I dropped in. Hello to all! Quick question, if I enter all data for a new house build in PHPP I can change the buildingâ€™s orientation quickly and see how it affects energy demand canâ€™t I?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Air Tightness - Door Blower Test Experiences</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12521</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12521</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:39:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Greenfish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Any one care to share their experiences of building air tightness testing and the results?<br /><br />Just had our door blower test run, not got results yet, but was underwhelmed by the experience. Pretty sure we are well within Part L requirements, but was hoping to get below 1 (units confused!) and have a chance to feel and listen for any tiny leaks. In the end the guy was happy things were "good enough", well of course they were, and the fan was on and off in minutes. More worrying he did not seal the MVHR input/output grilles, wish I had done it before hand. He said switching it off was enough, but I am convinced it  seals just because the fan isn't running. Also the seal of the fan into the door didn't look that great, I could see daylight around the cracks (no tape).<br /><br />So I will get a number, but not a true measure of what we have achieved, and no indication of the weak points. Was I hoping for too much?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Lack of Pellet boilers/stoves on SAP PCDB</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12052</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12052</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 09:39:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Harefield</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have hit an apparent bureaucratic wall and I wonder it anyone can help?  I want to install a small pellet boiler in my SIPS construction new build project.  The boiler I have chosen is on the MCS database and RHI approved but not on the SAP Product Characteristics Database (PCDB) owned by BRE (not surprising because there are only 20 on it at present).  I have had some email correspondence with a friendly chap called Will via the email link associated with the PCDB.  I asked how it was that a boiler could be on the MCS database of RHI purposes, but not on the PCDB. He stated that the only way for a boiler to get on the PCDB is for the manufacturer to apply.  For whatever reason the MCS database appears well populated and the PCDB very badly populated.  So at present, my only way forward if I want a small visually acceptable pellet boiler like the Pallazetti Anita 13kW is to accept the default efficiency of 65%.  This seems to be bureaucratic stupidity as its efficiency is 88%, accepted as such in mainland Europe and also on our own UK MCS database.  Any ideas please?:confused:]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>U-value calculations / Thermal Bridging</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15204</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=15204</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 18:45:07 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>rytech</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hello,<br /><br />I am new here so please accept may apologies if I have posted this in the wrong place.<br /><br />I wondered if anyone may have advice on how best to calculate the timber bridging factor where the <br />Engineer specifies the use of  double studs? I make it as 2 x 38mm studs =76mm<br />600 cts - 76/600 = 0.127 or 12.7%<br />400 cts - 76/400 = 0.19 or 19%<br /><br />The default factors within the U-Value conventions are 12.5% and 15% so the above seems a little low? Any advice would be gratefully received.<br /><br />Many thanks,<br />Ryan]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Vectorworks and Energos, with PHPP export</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13868</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13868</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>Shevek</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Vectorworks Architect, the CAD/BIM software I use now has a energy analysis module called Energos, and you can export to PHPP with it.<br /><br />Haven't had a chance to try it yet but I have my house retrofit fully modelled in Vectorworks so I'm going to take the chance to finally run the PHPP calcs on it. I'll let you know how it goes.<br /><br />Marketing video:<br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unjp-WuSL20<br /><br />Article:<br />http://planet.vectorworks.net/2015/09/improving-energy-efficiency-using-vectorworks-2016s-energos-tool/<br /><br />Help files<br />http://app-help.vectorworks.net/2016/eng/index.htm#t=VW2016_Guide%2FEnergyAnalysis%2FEnergos_Energy_Analysis_Module.htm]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What do I need, to find how well (or not) I'm doing?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14905</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14905</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2017 07:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>cjard</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've the general feeling that his house I've built is doing well from an energy consumption perspective, especially considering a reasonable chunk of it is double glazed and I still have a lot of fettling of systems to do but there's little science to this; it's just a report from my father in law(who built the neighbouring semi to a similar spec as I did) who is clock watching the electricity meter. My house uses 20 quid a week (16p/kWh) and his uses 35 (something wrong with that picture; his house is empty, heating off, 5 days a week)<br /><br />I'm sure he will also be interested in what I can learn from this thread<br /><br />So I'm after doing some data logging.. Just not sure what I'll need to measure, and what with (product recommendations). You can assume I've got loads of spare computing power and ability to program them, I just need connectable hardware. I'm also not so flush with money at the moment, until I temortgae the place so the boss will turn down any outlandish purchase requests :)<br /><br />Some weather station seems a given, temperature monitors for rooms, or maybe pipes. Electrical power consumption devices (clamp round cable type preferred, but I can also still cut the cable and joint it in as the cables leaving the CU are accessible..) might be required too?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>The devil is in the detail.</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14562</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14562</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:33:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>numenius</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[So today I got the results of the SAP calcs for our new build and was dismayed to see that despite over a total of 240mm insulation on the walls and roof, doubling up the underfloor insulation, airtight detail, careful avoiding of cold bridging way beyond normal builds etc etc, we came out at 82.... looked up what that actually means and I found 81 listed by the government as the average build last year, so in effect, all the shoddy volume builds you see with the airtightness of a sieve get the same rating!  This made no sense to me at all and made me wonder about saving thousands in insulation costs. BUT, when I enquired I was told it was dragged down because we are going to use an ASHP (orientation and being in a National Park makes solar PV all but pointless/impossible as you'd think I'd said I wanted to paint a swastika on the roof when I originally asked the National Park about it - and they absolutely forbid us fitting it later once the house is occupied (when we can afford to better) in a bizarre planning condition!) and bought in electricity is more polluting of course. So it looks like we will get a better rating and save a few grand if I fit an LPG gas boiler and burn fossil fuel! (we buy our electricity form a 100% renewables company - so this will actually make our carbon footprint worse... but improve our rating and save me a lot of money!) On one level we don't care about the rating as the house is being built for us to see our days out in, not sell, but on the other hand it is frustrating to take so much care about limiting the energy used, to have it classed as no better than the slapdash stuff I see being built with no care. Having watched some guys putting "insulation" into a cavity wall on a volume build the other week leaving massive gaps makes it even more galling to know that house and tens of thousands like it will be given the same (or possibly better) rating even though it will use **masses** more fuel to heat than ours.<br />                                                                                                                                                       <br />I encountered similar several years back when EPCs first appeared. Our then home was actually featured in the press and on the Energy Saving Trusts own web site as a good example... but when we came to sell it the EPC gave us a D!  That came down to the fact we had a log fired heating system and the software in use was so rigid that it basically recognised mains gas on a housing estate type house and nothing else (for example such systems have pipestats, not a tank stat - but the software then only recognised a tank stat - so lots of points lost because it "saw" an completely unregulated heating system, and so on) - so I've never been a huge fan of this particular industry as the systems seem even now to be too rigid. Though thankfully found a helpful assessor who explained it all to me this time.   <br /><br />But it does make me think is this stuff really worth the paper it's written on?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>PV generation in SAP calculation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14535</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14535</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:27:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>dicktc</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am looking at SAP calculations for a new build - the full printout which runs to about 30 pages. Section 10a (&quot;Fuel costs&quot;) takes the various energy requirements such as Space Heating and Lighting, and multiplies the &quot;Fuel kWh/year&quot; by &quot;Fuel price p/kWh&quot; to arrive at a &quot;Fuel cost Â£/year&quot;. So far so good. It then does a similar calculation for the energy generated by solar PV which it then nets off against the fuel costs. <br />I am assuming this PV figure is based on the total predicted PV generation for the year. However why would it be multiplied by the standard price for a unit of electricity? Isn't this misleading?<br />If my PV system generates electricity when I'm out all day and there is no demand, then surely that electricity will be sold back to the grid at a considerably worse unit price than the price I have to pay to buy electricity, so in reality it won't offset my energy costs in the way the SAP report suggests.<br />Grateful for your comments if anyone knows about this.<br />Thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal Bridge Calcs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14465</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:03:54 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Daren</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Has anyone heard of http://www.htflux.com/en/<br /><br /><br />Any comments?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SAP assessor needed</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14365</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14365</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:17:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>delboy</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi<br />Looking for a SAP assessor for 11 flats.<br />They are change of use in existing building, previously office, now reclassified as residential.<br />Not sure if this is Part L1a or 1b.<br />Please let me know if you're up for it.<br />(they are in Banbury).<br />Thanks<br />Del]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Optimum energy demand</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14338</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=14338</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:17:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I saw someone recently quote the passive house figure of 15 kWh/mÂ²/y and say that it could be viewed as a waste of money to go lower than this.<br /><br />The standard was set up over thirty years ago and a lot has changed since that time. Within the next thirty years energy prices will have risen hugely.<br /><br />What is the optimum energy demand for a building, is there such a thing and is it time or energy price dependant?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal imaging cameras</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=3290</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=3290</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>jamesbl</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I have wondered about how useful thermal image surveys are,  and how much you need to spend to get a camera that gives good informative  results for building surveys and energy leakage.  There seems to be  a lot of contradictory information out there,  and prices for thermal imaging cameras suitable for building applications vary from about  Â£2500 up to Â£20,000.   Howe much do you really need to spend ?  I would be very interested to hear people's experiences and views on these.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SAP calculations and the effect of rising heat</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13916</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13916</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>vord</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've written a little calculator in excel to see what effect changing thermal elements will have on energy usage. The calcs follow the normal accepted practice similar to that used in SAP calculations and It's going OK but I don't believe the results any more than I believe the SAP calculation I have.   <br /><br />For a completely uninsulated old solid brick house with 100mm insulation between rafters in the loft it comes up with:<br />Walls: 30%, roof: 12%, windows: 34%, floor: 23%<br /><br />I have upgraded most of the loft to 300mm insulation.  The heating upstairs (zoned and reasonably well controlled) no longer comes on at all.  Heating bills appear to be less than half what they were immediately before I insulated (though it is very warm this winter).   I am convinced the insulation has reduced heating by more than 8% - with that tiny reduction the heating upstairs would still be on but it isn't.<br /><br />I think the issue is that heat rises.  The SAP calculations (and my own) don't appear to take any account of this.   How would you go about plugging the effect into your own calculation?   <br /><br />Or does anyone have anecdotal evidence that could prove my calcs that suggest insulating the ground floor but leaving the roof poorly insulated would have a far greater effect than insulating the roof and leaving the ground floor un-insulated?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What U-Value software</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2741</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=2741</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:13:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>10100</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[does anyone here use u-value software and if so which one and why.<br /><br />tia.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>British Standards Energy Auditing documents - BS EN 16247-1</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13658</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13658</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:45:35 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Nick Parsons</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Can anyone lend me a copy?<br /><br />Thanks.<br /><br />Nick]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>3 Phase energy monitor recommendations.</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13654</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13654</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 19:45:23 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Chris P Bacon</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm trying to make an assessment of our energy usage for DHW so wish to monitor the electricity consumption of our immersion heater which is currently used for all our DHW.<br /><br />The immersion is 4.5kW, 3 phase, 400V and has a single cable of about 12mm diameter permanently wired via a safety switch box.<br /><br />When I go looking for a monitor to do the job all I seem to find are units with 3 clamp on sensors each to be clamped on to a single phase normally at the consumer unit to measure the buildings total electricity use.<br /><br />Is it possible to have a monitor with a sensor which will clamp on to the cable with all three phases combined in it or will I have to remove the sheathing from a length of cable so that I can place 3 individual sensors on to each phase?<br /><br />Is there a better way?<br /><br />I don't want to spend a load of money on this and don't want the expense of having to call in an electrician just for this although at some point in the future I will have one here to do another job but that may be quite a while from now.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Is PV worth having?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13433</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13433</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:16:57 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Triassic</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI or EROEI) is the amount of energy acquired from a particular energy source divided by the energy expended, or invested, in obtaining that energy. EROI is an essential and seemingly simple measure of the usable energy or â€œenergy profitâ€ from the exploitation of an energy source, but it is not so easy to determine all of the energy expenditures that should be included in the calculation. Because EROI values are generally low for renewable energy sources, differences in these estimates can lead to sharply divergent conclusions about the viability of these energy technologies. <br /><br />Prieto and Hall used government data from Spain, the sunniest European country, with accurate measures of generated energy from over 50,000 installations using several years of real-life data from optimized, efficient, multi-megawatt and well-oriented facilities.  These large installations are far less expensive and more efficient than rooftop solar-PV.<br /><br />Prieto and Hall conclude that the EROI of solar photovoltaic is only 2.45, very low despite Spainâ€™s ideal sunny climate.  Germanyâ€™s EROI is probably 20 to 33% less (1.6 to 2), due to less sunlight and less efficient rooftop installations.<br /><br />http://energyskeptic.com/2015/tilting-at-windmills-spains-solar-pv/<br /><br />Makes you wonder how efficient the UK s PV installations are?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How can home energy assessments be more useful?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13247</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13247</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>NEF</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The National Energy Foundation, an independent charity, is working with partners to develop 'My Home Energy Planner', an innovative free tool for assessing your homeâ€™s energy performance. We want this tool to help people better understand their energy use and to improve awareness of the upgrade opportunities and the best steps to take.<br /><br />To ensure we make My Home Energy Planner as useful as possible, we are conducting a survey to find out if you've ever previously assessed your home energy usage and what information you would like to be given when considering potential home improvements. <br /><br />We want to hear from you, whether you own or rent your home, regardless of how much you know about energy. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete and to thank you for completing the survey you can enter our PRIZE DRAW where we have 12 OWL Micro Wireless Energy Monitors to give away! Please complete the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/7H8X8KV<br /><br />If you have any questions please contact Alex on alexandra.steeland@nef.org.uk. The National Energy Foundation is a Registered Charity No. 298591. For more information, visit www.nef.org.uk. <br /><br />Thank you for your time.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Help with my first OpenBEM assessment</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13251</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=13251</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>gravelld</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I was hoping I could get some feedback on my first attempt at using OpenBEM, which is apparently based on SAP 2012.<br /><br />I have written this up in full on my blog: http://www.elstensoftware.com/blog/2015/03/28/first-openbem-assessment/ (sorry this post is HTML so no linky linky)<br /><br />Summary:<br /><br /><ul ><br /><li >SAP Rating: 68.5</li><br /><li >Annual Energy cost: Â£1589</li><br /><li >Floor 85.3 W/K</li><br /><li >Roof 27.9 W/K</li><br /><li >Walls 99.8 W/K</li><br /><li >Windows 168.5 W/K</li><br /><li >Ventilation 178.5 W/K</li><br /></ul><br /><br />A few thoughts:<br /><br />The ventilation figure is assumed given the data I entered. Until I get an air tightness test it can't be accurate, but I would not be surprised if it *is* the largest factor.<br /><br />It surprising how much the windows appear to be losing. Conventional wisdom amongst many appears to be replacing windows does not derive large savings. I suppose it depends on a case by case basis.<br /><br />Thermal bridges are ignored in SAP, right? So things I have such as the following will not be considered:<br /><br /><ul ><br /><li >Some (not many, thankfully) plasterboard walls (I felt a draught through a plug socket yesterday!)</li><br /><li >Unfilled external sides of cavity walls being brought into the thermal envelope following extension, the whole cavity then acts as a 'chimney'' into the loft (I've done a thermal imaging camera survey that showed this. Another blog post, when I get around to it)</li><br /><li >External walls bridging the thermal envelope into ground floor extensions</li><br /></ul><br /><br />Do I need to worry about these types of things, considering I am not aiming at Passivhaus levels (we have neither the time nor the money to achieve this)? Let's say I have my eye on AECB Silver which would mean cutting our heat demand by about 60% per mÂ². The trouble is that because they aren't considered in the model, I can't do a "what if" scenario to see if they make much difference.<br /><br />What does SAP occupancy mean? The number of 3.1 seems low for a house of this size if it means the average number of people living in the house.<br /><br />Is a fan-assisted flue (as we have on our oil boiler) the same as an open flue?<br /><br />I have attached all the input data (it's JSON encoded but I had to name it txt to get it attached), all opinions appreciated.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RHI and green deal assessments</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12485</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12485</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 14:46:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>sl638e</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I'm thinking of adding solar thermal under the Renewable Heat Incentive scheme, but the question is how to get started.<br /><br />It looks like we have to begin by getting an Energy Performance Certificate and a Green Deal assessment, and we may need some additional loft insulation to qualify for the scheme (borderline at the moment). <br /><br />A search for assessors in the area brings up 90 results, some being companies I know already and don't fully trust.<br /><br />The question is how to select a reliable company from these - one which will give me useful info and not try to sell me anything inferior. Does anyone have any tips on this?<br /><br />Would you search for providers who install solar thermal, for example, or would you look for an independent assessor who isn't tied to any products or services?<br /><br />Alternatively, would it be better to approach companies who install solar (and who come recommended to me) but who don't have any connection to the Green Deal scheme? I guess they might be able to put me in touch with people who can do the assessment, even though they don't offer it themselves.<br /><br />Btw I don't expect that we will want to take up a green deal loan, although I'm not ruling it out. I'm only following that route in order to qualify for RHI.<br /><br />Any help appreciated!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Specific Heating Demand</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12901</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12901</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>revor</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Bit stuck with getting my head around an issue as to whether to install my heating system myself and forego the RHI. From what I can make out so far because we have stuffed the house full of insulation such that the u values are that of a passive house (but have 2G not 3G) does not look like we would get much RHI and certainly would not cover the cost of a high quality German or Austrian pellet boiler but would possibly cover an Italian job but need to check out if my assumption is correct.<br />The house is a stone farmhouse but I made the mistake of externally insulating it to early we should have just done enough to get an EPC at the lower end then get the generous RHI and insulate later. Seemingly had we not externally insulated, the house would have been classed as a pre 1900 house the RHI would then have been very generous, but the Green Deal assessor has told me that the EPC would take into account the external insulation which puts the house in a completely different category.<br />We have added an extension with wider cavities at double the Building regs requirement. We do not have a SAPS because it is not new build and because we have not finished the build cannot get an EPC and the assessor has stated he cannot do one until the heating system is installed, but at the moment I cannot determine the best system to put in. If I could calculate the Specific Heat Demand ( Kwh/sq.m/year) of the completed house then I can use this in an RHI calculator which would give me a good indication of where to go with it. The company that designed the u/f heating system calculated from the u values I have supplied a heating loading of the system in Kw at -3 deg c ambient. Does anyone know how I can get from this figure to the Specific Heating Demand?<br />Thanks]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Use of Heating Degree Days</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12847</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12847</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>andyman99</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am looking at how to measure the effects of the insulation and airtightness improvements I have made over the last few years. I have the heating degree days for the last 3 years. My heating source for both ch and dhw is an oil boiler - pressure jet Iâ€™m afraid not the best I know. I have the oil usage over that period. My issue is how to account for oil used by the dhw during the months where I donâ€™t have any ch on. Has anyone tried to do this, if so Iâ€™d be interested in your method? I can only think of looking at the boiler oil flow which I know is 3.1 l per hour and making an estimate of burn time per hour hot water on.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Best U-value / condensation / SAP software...</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6574</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6574</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>James Norton</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[After relying for some time on energy assessors and freeware; as the latter seems to be drying up. We are looking at investing in some accredited SAP software to use as part of our architectural services.  <br /><br />Although we would do the traditional SAP and SBEM calcs for building regs the goal is to use a tool that will inform the design process and add some more quantative data to our overal consultancy service. <br /><br />We are only a small team so can't afford big cash and would only probably need one seat, it would need to be pretty user friendly and allow us to get some presentation info off it (or the data that we could feed into a chart software package), and would need all the basic stuff including renewables contribution etc. <br /><br />Any ideas...?<br /><br />J]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>How are EPC ratings calculated?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12756</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12756</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<author>atomicbisf</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I've just had a Green Deal Assessment and the resulting EPC rating of D 57. However I've looked at the online EPC register and an identical neighbouring house has a rating of C 76, despite every listed element either being the same or worse than my house. For example I have more loft insulation, better heating controls, better wall insulation etc, better lighting etc. They do not have a single listed thing that scores better than me, yet are nine points higher.<br /><br />Can this number be trusted at all?<br /><br />Ed]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>CSH check sheet for self assessment</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12666</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12666</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:49:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>Greenfish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Out of curiousity is there a CSH check sheet available from somewhere? I would like to retrospectively self assess my build just to see how we did. Grand Designs set me off - Norfolk build was CSH 6 because of some meadow planting, WTK! Our SAP just missed A due to lack of gas combi (no gas supply), so think these scoring things are pretty dodgy anyway, but still curious.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why so much concrete when relaying a floor</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12498</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12498</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 00:30:42 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>bogal2</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Planning to dig up concrete floors to insulate in my house retrofit. It seems that the general guidance is then to relay more concrete on top. Floors in this situation are not really load bearing surely so why the need for concrete? We drive cars onto block paving laid onto compacted sand and hardcore, trains seem to run on sleepers laid onto gravel! Anyone tried using clay floors?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thermal bridging or not?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12489</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12489</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:33:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>DaffyLizardChunks</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I am trying to calculate the energy lost from the beams of a block and beam floor to a buildings foundations. <br /><br />After much research into building physics I am very confused about how to do this. It is is thermal bridging but none of the calculation methods that I have found seem appropriate to me. It also seems increasingly likely that I will need to find a modelling programme which I would rather not do. <br /><br />Can anyone help?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Vacuum Cleaner power limits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12472</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12472</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 23:38:59 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[The EEC has just hit us with power limits for vacuum cleaners.<br /><br />Do they realise that all that energy finishes up inside the homes as heat? the majority of vacuuming happens indoors during the heating season and only a very tiny proportion outdoors with the energy totally wasted.<br /><br />I think it would be a good idea if it was helping reduce energy use but is it?  There are also downsides to not cleaning so effectively.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Seasonal Performance Factor for RHI - ASHP</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12398</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12398</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:53:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>shuff27</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Hi, my new home (self build completed last summer) has an ASHP which qualifies me for RHI (legacy systems).  I understand that the default SPF value will be 2.5, so I'm wondering if it's worth having an SPF report done to determine whether the actual value is higher &amp; will therefore generate a larger RHI payment.<br /><br />Not coincidentally I've just received a mailshot from Home Survey Reports Ltd ('recommended partner' of my installer Ice Energy) offering to carry out the report for Â£200+VAT.  It provides a sliding scale of increased RHI payments, starting at Â£302 over 7 years for an SPF of 2.7.  This is based on a house using 20,000 kwh p.a.; the EPC for my house estimates demand at 26,000 kwh p.a.<br /><br />Anyone in a position to advise/guesstimate whether my installation (Ecodan 14kw heat pump running wet UFH downstairs, domestic hot water, rads - rarely required - in bedrooms) is likely to have a SPF higher than 2.5?<br /><br />And I wonder what this company actually does to produce its report - if it's anything like a SAP I expect not a lot!<br /><br />Thanks in advance,<br />shuff27 (newbie member)]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Blob &amp; dob -- thermal images</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9040</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9040</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:47:04 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>tony</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Many new buildings use dry lined wall finishes and although these can sometimes be reasonably air tight (though often are not) outdoor air can infiltrate too easily behind the linings.<br /><br />Has anyone got any thermal imaging pictures of blobbed and dobbed walls in the winter or on windy days?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RHI for solar and ASHP problem with EPC advice welcomed....</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12156</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=12156</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:40:06 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>RobinB</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Finally filling in the forms for the RHI and realised I need an EPC for our house which we built in 2010 (at least I think from the RHI form that I need one.) I had the EPC done this weekend. It's come out at a C with an estimated fuel consumption at around 3 times our actual. This is OK as far as the application goes apart from one point I'm worrying about. <br />I know they can't count all that invisible insulation and airtighness but they have been forced to put "solar and immersion" for DHW when in fact it's "Solar and ASHP" because the tick boxes don't allow two sorts of renewables on an EPC. Do you think this will cause problems with the RHI application for ASHP? Any way round it? The man who did the EPC says it cannot be changed. <br />thanks!<br />Robin]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>kWh for wood(biomass) burning</title>
		<link>https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9640</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=9640</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:25:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<author>jamesingram</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[This has been discussed elsewhere but thought it might be of interest under it's own heading<br /><br />So got this figure for wood from steamytea 4.5kWh/kg<br />and this 4.2kw/kg for seasoned wood from http://www.nottenergy.com/energy_cost_comparison/<br />also seen estimate for kWh/m3 but can find it .<br />Ok I know it's a bit of a best guess area , but if you're interested in logging your energy use to compare to other forms of heating energy whats the best option ?<br /><br />How about ,; I've a 5kW stoves, so if it's on for an hour, that's 5kWh used , is that to simplistic ?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>